Beyond the Technical

I read a fair amount of books, blogs, and listen to several podcasts on photography. A common thread these days seem to be a thirst by many readers and listeners for formulaic “how to” information. As if photography was a “one size fits all” activity. It’s not. Photography is creativity, and you can’t put a formula on creativity. Photography is art, and again, you can’t put a formula on art. But like, art, there is a technical side to photography. In order to paint you need to learn how to mix colors, and handle a paintbrush, and take advantage of the type of media you are painting on. Similarly photography has shutter speeds, aperture, ISO, and depth-of-field that photographers must master to excel in their craft.

The popularity of this “how to” information clearly shows that photographers are eager for information about the basics. However, many never really move beyond the basics because they become overly concerned with the technicalities of taking a picture. Shutter speed, aperture, ISO, depth-of-field; how do they all relate to one another? How do I know which variable to change to get the image I want to create? This is where the majority of hobbyists get stuck, in the details. So books and the Internet have tried to fill this gap with information and tutorials. Magic formulas for given situations. Many do a great job of teaching you how to take a shot under given set of conditions, but few venture on to explain why. Therein lays the problem. It is easy to explain “how”, but a lot more difficult to explain the “why”, because “how” is technical but “why” is purely creative. It is in understanding the “why” that lets a photographer move beyond the basics.

A famous artist can teach you how to create a brush stroke, he may not be able to impart to you the creativity needed to take full advantage of using that painting technique. It’s much easier for him to simply have you create a similar image along side of him so that you can experience the same circumstances and learn when he uses that particular brush stroke. Through having shared experiences he hopes that you will pick up on his creativity. In photography you can’t always share the experience with an expert. There are many who offer workshops, but often they have equipment that is different from yours. Also, is a one, two, three, or five day workshop enough to move you beyond the basics? It’s probably not, at least not enough to overcome old habits.

So what’s a struggling digital photographer to do? We’ll here’s the secret to moving beyond those basics, practice. That’s it. Forget about creativity for a while. Forget about trying to get images similar to those of a photographer whom you admire. Spend a few weeks, just practicing the basics. Start with one variable at a time. Lock in the rest, and go shoot. Spend a day changing only the shutter speed. See its effects. Do the same for aperture, then ISO, etc. In this way you are creating your own experiences, and learning each variable on its own. By seeing what each of these items do on their own, you will get a feel for how they each affect the final image. Soon you’ll find that your creative side will take over, and it will combine all of these variables and start creating images the way you intended them to be.

You see, too much is made of the interrelation of shutter speed, aperture, ISO, and depth-of-field. Many people have trouble with these concepts because they are trying to understand it from a technical point of view, when it’s not. The individual pieces (shutter speed, aperture, ISO, depth-of-field) are technical. So you need to understand what each does individually. However, how they relate to one another and how to use them together is purely creative.

Going digital, the death of creativity.

There is something about the analog process of shooting on film and making your own prints that made those photographers a lot more creative. I think it was the smaller margin of error that working with film afforded that made these photographers more creative. Limitations inspire creativity. When there’s room to make mistakes, people will make mistakes, but sometimes those mistakes turn out to be wonderful surprises. Did you forget to process your film correctly? Maybe you pushed it one stop, but forgot to process it that way. Maybe you left the photo paper in the chemicals for too long. More often than not, these mistakes led to disasters, but occasionally they might produce something extraordinary that might lead you to try new styles and techniques. It inspired experimentation and creativity.

The lack of instant feedback also inspired creativity. You never knew if you got the shot or not, so you’d take the same picture over and over again with different exposures, different lighting, and different film; hoping that one of the shots would turn out. If you were lucky, you’d have many versions to choose from afterwards.

Unfortunately, I’m finding a lot of that type of creativity has gone missing in today’s digital world. You would think that the instant feedback, lower processing cost, and unlimited post processing possibilities would lead to unheard amounts of creativity. Instead digital seems to have narrowed the vision of many of today’s photographers. The lack of limitations creates paralysis. Everything from EXIF data to Photoshop settings are studied and duplicated from one person to the next. It has become a game of precision, rather than creativity.

Before, photographers would talk about their stories of how a particular picture was taken. How one waited for the right moment, said something silly to get the right expression, or how the light reacted in an unforeseen way. Those stories are far fewer these days. Instead it’s all about the lens, camera body, aperture, shutter speed, ISO, exact time of day, or light placement. The subject becomes secondary to the technicality of taking the picture. Everyone wants a formula that says if you do x, then you will always get y. Photography doesn’t always work that way.

I suppose this type of formulaic precision was bound to make its way into photography, once digital became popular. Over 15 years of working with computers has taught me that. Working for corporations that wanted their business plans to be as simple as a formula that could be predicted by a computer. Our strategy is x and the computer predicts that the result will be y. To assume that the computer must always be right has been the downfall of many business strategists. It isn’t. For one thing the computer can only make the calculation based on what it knows, and it cannot know everything. It lacks information relating to experience, trends, and most of all it lacks imagination.

So the next time you pick up your camera, think a little differently. Try not to worry so much about what your settings are. Experiment, play, and be creative.



Photographing the Total Lunar Eclipse on February 20th was challenging. After reading several tutorials on the web about how to do it, rapidly changing conditions due to cloud cover and winds made any planning I had done go straight out of the window. So I winged it.

This image is available for download as a desktop wallpaper in several resolutions:

Widescreen 960 x 600 Full Screen 1024 x 768
Widescreen 1280 x 800 Full Screen 1280 x 1024
Widescreen 1440 x 900 Full Screen 1600 x 1200
Widescreen 1680 x 1050 Widescreen 1920 x 1200